RPRNA

Search results for: “one ui 2”

  • iPadOS features you might miss but should use

    iPadOS features you might miss but should use

    I’ve shared before that my iPad Pro is my go-to device for work, even though I have a Mac Mini. The hardware is stunning, and the way it handles single apps is just perfect. With iPadOS 18, Apple introduced tons of new features that make this love affair even stronger. Let’s dive into some lesser-known but super useful features.

    1. Easy Unit Converter

    iPadOS 18 finally brought a calculator app to the iPad, but it’s the built-in converter that’s a game changer. Whether you need to change centimeters to feet, Pascals to Bar, or dollars to Rupees, it’s all there. Plus, it works offline, so no internet? No problem!

    2. Sharing Wi-Fi with a QR Code

    Sharing Wi-Fi with friends is now easier, even if they don’t have an Apple device. The new Passwords app lets you create a QR code for your Wi-Fi:

    • Open the Passwords app.
    • Click on Wi-Fi.
    • Select your network.
    • Tap ‘show QR code’.
    • Let your guest scan the code. They’re connected!

    3. Formatting Drives

    This was a big one for me. Now, you can format drives or SD cards right from the Files app:

    • Connect your SSD to your iPad.
    • Long press the drive in the Files app.
    • Tap ‘erase’.
    • Choose your format.
    • Tap “erase” again. Done!

    4. Turn Apps into Widgets

    Customizing your home screen just got easier. Now, you can turn any app into a widget directly:

    • Long press an app icon.
    • If it has a widget, you can change it right there without going into settings.

    5. Hide Unwanted Web Content

    Safari’s new feature lets you hide annoying parts of web pages:

    • Go to any page in Safari.
    • Tap the three dots in the URL bar.
    • Choose ‘Hide Unwanted Content’.
    • Tap what you want to hide.
    • Click ‘hide’. It’s gone until you decide otherwise!

    These features really make your iPad experience smoother and more tailored to your needs. Check out these hidden gems and make your iPad work even better for you.

  • Why Apple avoids big iOS redesigns now

    Why Apple avoids big iOS redesigns now

    Remember when iOS updates used to bring huge changes? Think back to iOS 7. Those times seem to be fading away, and a recent app fiasco explains why.

    The Sonos App Mess as a Warning

    Sonos, if you’ve missed it, has been having a rough time. They changed their CEO after a disastrous app redesign in 2024. This new version of the Sonos app, launched in April, led to a year-long stream of customer complaints and negative publicity.

    This situation with the Sonos app is a clear lesson for why Apple might steer clear of massive iOS overhauls. If this had happened when Sonos had fewer, more tech-savvy users, perhaps the impact wouldn’t have been so severe. They could have fixed issues quickly, or users would have just adapted.

    The Risk of Overhauling iOS

    In the iPhone’s early days, Apple could manage big changes because fewer people used their devices. Now, with millions of users of all tech levels relying on iPhones, major changes are risky. Even if many like the new look, the sheer number of users means there’s bound to be significant opposition.

    Apple knows that iOS can’t stay the same forever, though. Instead of a whole system redesign, they’ve chosen to update parts of iOS one at a time. For instance, the Photos app in iOS 18 stirred up some trouble, but it was only one app, so the blowback was contained. Redesigning all of iOS at once would be a much bigger gamble.

    User Feedback and Iterative Updates

    A top comment on an article about this issue pointed out that comparing the Sonos app rebuild to an iOS redesign isn’t quite fair. Redesigning something like iOS 7 is just giving it a new look, not rebuilding it from the ground up like Sonos did. Apple’s approach would be more like painting over the existing structure, not rebuilding the house.

    For many iPhone users, the idea of another major redesign might sound daunting rather than exciting. The lesson from Sonos is clear: for companies with a huge user base, big changes can lead to big problems. Maybe we should all get used to seeing iOS evolve through smaller, less disruptive updates.

  • Siri’s super bowl slip-up: gives eagles 33 fake wins

    Siri’s super bowl slip-up: gives eagles 33 fake wins

    In a recent test, Siri showed it still has trouble with basic facts. One Foot Tsunami’s Paul Kafasis checked how well Siri knew Super Bowl history, and the results were not great. Siri only got it right 34% of the time, correctly naming just 20 winners out of 58 Super Bowls.

    The most surprising mistake was Siri saying the Philadelphia Eagles won 33 Super Bowls. In reality, the Eagles have only won one. Siri’s answers were all over the place, sometimes talking about the wrong Super Bowl or giving unrelated football info.

    Siri did okay for a little while, correctly answering for Super Bowls V to VII, but then it went off track, getting 15 answers wrong in a row from XVII to XXXII. When asked about Super Bowl XVI, Siri even suggested asking ChatGPT, which gave the right answer, showing Siri’s knowledge isn’t up to par.

    This test was done on iOS 18.2.1 with Apple’s new smart tech, and the same problems were seen on the latest iOS beta and macOS. Kafasis put all the results into a spreadsheet you can look at.

    Daring Fireball’s John Gruber also tested Siri with sports questions and found it did worse than other search engines and AI like ChatGPT, Kagi, DuckDuckGo, and Google. Interestingly, the old version of Siri was better at admitting when it didn’t know the answer by showing web links, which at least gave a chance at finding the right answer.

    Gruber was quite critical, saying:

    “New Siri, with Apple’s smart tech and ChatGPT help, gives answers that are completely but believably wrong, which is the worst kind of mistake. It’s also inconsistent in its errors — I asked the same thing four times and got four different wrong answers.”

    Siri’s performance has been criticized before, but these tests show how it can confidently give wrong information. Apple is working on a smarter Siri using advanced language models, hoping to make it as good as other chatbots like ChatGPT. They plan to show off this new Siri in 2025 but won’t release it until spring 2026 with iOS 19.

  • Apple Unveils ‘HomePad’: A smart home hub with innovative features

    Apple Unveils ‘HomePad’: A smart home hub with innovative features

    Apple is set to revolutionize home tech with its upcoming ‘HomePad’, a new smart display designed to blend seamlessly into your living space. Here are the five core features that will define this device:

    1. 7-inch Square Display: Initially rumored to be a 6-inch screen, the HomePad has been upgraded to a 7-inch display. Its design resembles a square iPad, roughly the size of two iPhone 16 Pro Max models side by side, offering a compact yet functional interface.

    2. New Operating System – ‘homeOS’: The HomePad introduces a novel operating system, possibly named ‘homeOS’. This OS combines elements of the Apple Watch’s interface and the iPhone’s StandBy mode, dynamically adjusting the display based on the user’s proximity for an interactive experience.

    3. Widget Support: Following the trend set by StandBy mode, the HomePad will support widgets, allowing users to customize their home screen much like on an iPhone or iPad. While the inclusion of third-party widgets remains uncertain, Apple’s recent macOS updates suggest they might extend this functionality.

    4. Versatile Accessories: To adapt to various home environments, Apple is crafting multiple attachments for the HomePad. These include wall mounts for security panel aesthetics and bases with additional speakers for kitchen, bedroom, or office use, ensuring the device fits into your home’s aesthetic and functionality needs.

    5. Enhanced Siri with AI: Unlike current Apple home devices, the HomePad will feature an AI-enhanced Siri, thanks to integration with technologies like ChatGPT. This upgrade promises to handle a broader array of commands and understand user context better, aiming to reduce those all-too-common “I’m sorry” responses from Siri.

    The HomePad promises to be more than just a smart display; it’s envisioned as a central hub for smart home control, video calls, and more, making daily life more connected and intuitive.

  • TikTok’s Return to U.S. Screens: Navigating the new normal

    TikTok’s Return to U.S. Screens: Navigating the new normal

    In a rollercoaster of events, TikTok has made a comeback in the U.S., though not without its challenges. After going dark on Saturday night and being pulled from Apple’s App Store, the platform was up and running again by Sunday afternoon, following what TikTok called “necessary clarity” from President Trump.

    Here’s the scoop: despite its functionality being restored, TikTok isn’t back on the App Store. This means new users can’t download it, and existing users can’t update it. The ban, initiated by a law signed by President Biden in April 2024, required TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance, to divest within nine months or face a ban. That deadline hit on January 19, leading to a brief blackout of the app.

    However, thanks to an assurance from Trump, service providers like Oracle have continued supporting TikTok, risking hefty fines, while tech giants like Apple and Google remain cautious, not re-listing the app.

    For existing iPhone users, this means you can still use TikTok if you have it installed, but no new downloads or updates are available through the App Store. The app’s core functionalities are intact, including TikTok Shop, but new in-app purchases are off-limits, although web purchases remain accessible.

    With Trump’s recent inauguration, he’s hinted at a 90-day delay in enforcing the ban and proposed U.S. ownership in TikTok, signaling potential changes on the horizon. How ByteDance responds to this proposition will shape TikTok’s future in the U.S. market.

  • Elevating Apple Music playlists with AI artistry

    Elevating Apple Music playlists with AI artistry

    Apple Music hasn’t seen direct AI enhancements yet, but a new feature from Apple Intelligence, introduced with iOS 18.2, is indirectly enhancing the music app experience. Here’s how:

    Image Playground: The Artwork Solution for Apple Music

    Apple’s Image Playground is an AI tool designed to generate unique images. While not yet integrated into Apple Music, it offers an innovative way to enhance playlist aesthetics. Previously, selecting or creating the perfect artwork for playlists was often a challenge, with the default options feeling repetitive or lacking personal touch.

    Now, with Image Playground, users can craft bespoke artwork. The process is straightforward: describe your vision in the app, and AI generates several images to choose from. Once you’ve selected your favorite, save it to your Photos library and import it into your Apple Music playlist. This is done by accessing the playlist, hitting the edit option from the three dots menu, and selecting the camera icon to add your custom image.

    A New Era for Playlists

    The introduction of Image Playground has transformed playlist creation from a functional task into an artistic one. It allows for a more personalized listening experience, where each playlist not only sounds unique but looks unique too. Initially perceived as just a playful tool, Image Playground has found a practical application in enhancing the visual appeal of Apple Music playlists.

    As we look forward to potential updates, there’s hope that future iOS versions might integrate this feature directly into Apple Music, making the process even more seamless. For now, Image Playground stands as a testament to how AI can subtly improve everyday app functionalities, turning them into sources of creativity and personal expression.

  • AirTags Prevent Car Theft: Colorado Police offer free trackers

    AirTags Prevent Car Theft: Colorado Police offer free trackers

    In a bid to curb the rising tide of vehicle thefts, the Arvada Police Department in Colorado has taken an innovative approach by distributing Apple AirTags for free to community members. This move comes in light of the proven effectiveness of these small, $30 devices in thwarting car thefts since their launch in 2021.

    The giveaway, which took place on January 19, 2025, not only provided AirTags but also included a mix of other tracking devices like Tile. According to local reports, half of the trackers available were handed out, each accompanied by a car sticker warning potential thieves that the vehicle is equipped with a tracking device.

    One resident, previously a victim of car theft, expressed his support for the initiative, noting the potential deterrent effect of the stickers and the confidence that his car could be recovered if stolen again.

    Since their introduction, AirTags have not only been pivotal in vehicle recovery but have also been involved in various other scenarios, from uncovering local fraud to international espionage. Despite controversies surrounding their potential misuse for stalking, Apple has consistently enhanced the device’s privacy features to prevent such incidents.

    As AirTags continue to prove their utility, there’s anticipation around an update expected in 2025, which might bring improved location accuracy and extended range, maintaining the device’s significance in personal security and asset tracking.

  • M3 Chip confirmed for upcoming iPad Air models

    M3 Chip confirmed for upcoming iPad Air models

    In what appears to be a significant leak, renowned tech leaker Evan Blass has shared details suggesting that Apple’s next iPad Air models will feature the new M3 chip. According to a glimpse of what seems to be internal source code, Blass hinted at the arrival of new 11-inch and 13-inch iPad Air versions, alongside an entry-level iPad 11.

    Blass, who has a history of accurate leaks, including pre-announcement reveals of the iPhone 12 and HomePod mini, posted this information on a private social media account. His latest leak counters previous speculation that the iPad Air might skip the M3 and directly adopt the M4 chip, which is currently exclusive to the iPad Pro line. This move would align with Apple’s strategy to differentiate between its tablet offerings by chip generation, rather than using the more costly and less efficient first-generation 3nm process chips.

    While the specifics of the iPad 11 remain somewhat under wraps, Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman has suggested it might come equipped with the A17 Pro chip, enhancing its capabilities for Apple Intelligence features. Additionally, the leak hints at the development of a new iPhone SE 4, continuing Apple’s tradition of refreshing its budget smartphone line.

    Apple updated the iPad Air last in May 2024 with the M2 chip, introducing for the first time a 13-inch model. If these leaks hold true, we might see these new devices announced as early as March or April, potentially with new Magic Keyboard accessories to complement them. However, no drastic design changes are expected, keeping the focus on internal upgrades.

     

  • Bridging the Gap: Customization and connectivity in the Apple Ecosystem

    Bridging the Gap: Customization and connectivity in the Apple Ecosystem

    The lines between Apple’s operating systems, iOS and macOS, have blurred significantly in recent years. Features often debut on iPhones and iPads before making their way to Macs, creating a more cohesive user experience. Yet, some key areas of divergence remain, particularly in customization, and whispers of Apple revisiting the networking space suggest exciting possibilities for the future.

    One of the most noticeable differences lies in the level of personalization offered across devices. While iPhones and iPads have embraced extensive customization options, Macs have lagged behind. Let’s delve into some specific areas where macOS could benefit from adopting features already present in iOS and iPadOS.

    The Lock Screen: A Canvas for Expression

    With the introduction of iOS 16 and iPadOS 17, Apple transformed the lock screen from a static display into a dynamic hub. Users gained the ability to add widgets, personalize fonts, and create multiple lock screens tailored to different contexts. This level of personalization brought a fresh, vibrant feel to the mobile experience. 

    In contrast, while a step forward, macOS Sonoma’s lock screen redesign felt comparatively restrained. It lacked the interactive elements and granular control offered on iOS and iPadOS. The absence of widgets and font customization left many Mac users yearning for a similar level of expressive freedom. Imagine a Mac lock screen that could display calendar appointments, weather updates, or even control smart home devices at a glance. This seamless integration of information and functionality would significantly enhance the Mac’s user experience.

    App Icons: A Matter of Preference

    App icon customization is another area where iOS and iPadOS have taken the lead. While developers have long had the option to offer alternative icons within their apps on mobile, iOS and iPadOS 18 introduced system-wide options for dark mode and tinting, allowing for more cohesive home screen aesthetics. This subtle but impactful feature allows users to further personalize their devices and create a visual experience that resonates with their individual tastes. 

    While macOS allows for basic app icon changes, it’s not as prevalent or seamless as on mobile. Expanding these options on macOS could offer users a greater sense of ownership over their digital environment. Imagine being able to match your app icons to your desktop wallpaper or create themed workspaces based on color palettes. This level of personalization, while seemingly minor, can significantly enhance user satisfaction and engagement.

    Control Center: Centralized Control, Personalized Access

    The Control Center, a central hub for quick settings and controls, has also seen significant improvements on iOS and iPadOS. Recent updates have enabled third-party app integration, allowing developers to create custom toggles for their services. This empowers users to tailor their Control Center to their specific needs, providing quick access to frequently used functions. 

    macOS’s Control Center, while functional, has remained largely unchanged since its introduction. Implementing third-party integration, similar to iOS and iPadOS, would greatly enhance its utility. Imagine controlling smart lights, music playback from various apps, or even VPN connections directly from the Control Center. This level of integration would streamline workflows and provide a more unified experience across the Apple ecosystem.

    Beyond Software: Whispers of Apple’s Networking Ambitions

    Beyond software features, rumors have surfaced regarding Apple’s potential return to the networking hardware market. While a direct successor to the AirPort routers isn’t currently in development, Apple is reportedly exploring alternative approaches.

    The development of the “Proxima” wireless networking chip, designed for integration into various home products like the Apple TV and HomePod, has sparked speculation. This sophisticated chip is reportedly capable of functioning as a wireless access point, potentially transforming existing Apple devices into network hubs. While Apple might not heavily promote this functionality, its mere existence opens up exciting possibilities. 

    Imagine an Apple TV or HomePod seamlessly extending your Wi-Fi network, providing robust and secure connectivity throughout your home. This integrated approach could offer a compelling alternative to traditional routers, particularly for users already invested in the Apple ecosystem. It could also address growing concerns about privacy and security in home networking, offering a trusted solution from a company known for its commitment to user privacy.

    In conclusion, while the gap between iOS, iPadOS, and macOS has narrowed, key differences remain, particularly in the realm of customization. Bringing features like lock screen personalization, enhanced app icon control, and expanded Control Center functionality to macOS would create a more unified and engaging user experience.

    Furthermore, Apple’s exploration of new networking technologies suggests a potential return to the hardware space, offering exciting possibilities for integrated connectivity within the home. By bridging these gaps, Apple can further solidify its ecosystem and provide users with a truly seamless and personalized computing experience.

  • Big Tech Fines: A drop in the ocean or a Wake-Up Call?

    Big Tech Fines: A drop in the ocean or a Wake-Up Call?

    The world of technology is constantly evolving, pushing boundaries and shaping our modern lives. However, this rapid growth and influence haven’t come without scrutiny. Recent years have seen a surge in regulatory actions against major tech companies, resulting in billions of dollars in fines for various infractions, primarily related to antitrust and competition law violations. But the question remains: are these fines a significant deterrent, or merely a cost of doing business for these corporate giants?

    A recent analysis of tech fines paints a stark picture. While the total sum of penalties levied against major tech players in 2024 reached a staggering $8.2 billion, a closer look reveals a different story. This seemingly enormous figure represents a mere fraction of these companies’ financial power. In fact, most of these tech behemoths could comfortably cover these fines within a matter of days or weeks using their free cash flow – the money left over after covering operating expenses and capital expenditures.

    Consider Apple, for example. The tech giant faced over $2.1 billion in fines last year, primarily for alleged antitrust violations. While this number sounds substantial, it represents just over a week’s worth of the company’s free cash flow. This means that Apple could theoretically pay off all its fines with less than eight days of earnings. This raises serious questions about the effectiveness of fines as a regulatory tool. If these penalties represent such a small portion of a company’s resources, are they truly a deterrent against anti-competitive behavior?

    The analysis also highlighted other tech giants and their respective fine burdens. Google, facing nearly $3 billion in fines, could clear its debt in just over two weeks. Meta, with fines exceeding $1.4 billion, could do the same in under ten days. Even Amazon, despite facing a relatively smaller fine of around $57 million, could pay it off with less than a day’s worth of earnings. These figures underscore the immense financial power of these companies and cast doubt on the efficacy of the current fining system.

    The core issue lies in the disparity between the scale of the fines and the financial resources of the companies being fined. For most individuals or small businesses, a substantial fine can have a devastating impact. However, for these tech giants, billions of dollars can be absorbed with minimal disruption to their operations. This creates a situation where fines are perceived as a minor inconvenience rather than a serious consequence, potentially emboldening these companies to engage in practices that might otherwise be considered too risky.

    One of Apple’s largest fines stemmed from an EU ruling related to competition in the music streaming market. This case, and others like it, highlight concerns about these companies’ dominance and their potential to stifle innovation and competition. When the penalty for breaking competition laws amounts to a negligible portion of a company’s earnings, the incentive to comply with these laws diminishes significantly.

    Experts and industry observers have voiced concerns about this issue, arguing that regulators need to adopt a more impactful approach. The current system of fines, while well-intentioned, fails to address the underlying problem: the immense financial disparity between regulators and the companies they regulate. Some suggest that regulators should explore alternative measures, such as imposing stricter operational restrictions, breaking up monopolies, or even pursuing criminal charges against executives in cases of egregious misconduct.

    The goal of regulation should not be simply to generate revenue through fines, but rather to ensure a fair and competitive marketplace. If fines are not acting as a sufficient deterrent, it’s time for regulators to re-evaluate their strategies and find more effective ways to hold these powerful companies accountable. The future of innovation and competition may depend on it. Creating an environment where all companies, regardless of size, can thrive is crucial. This requires strong competition legislation and, more importantly, robust enforcement. Without it, the current system risks becoming a mere slap on the wrist for the world’s most powerful tech companies.

More posts